From Russia with Fraud - Instablogs
From Russia with Fraud
Kim , New York: Apr 20 2008
Made Popular Apr 21 2008
Russia :

From Russia with FraudThanks to the determined work of Russian physicist and computer expert Sergei Shpilkin, we now know that 56% of Russians voted in the recent “presidential elections,” not 70% as the Kremlin claimed.

Of those who voted, 63% cast votes for the “winner,” Dimitri Medvedev — not 70% as the Kremlin claimed.

The Kremlin, lying through its yellow, broken teeth, claimed that Medvedev won 70% of 70% of the electorate — in other words, that Medvedev had the support of 49% the country’s eligible voters.

In fact, he got 63% of 56% — a mere 35% of the country stood behind him.

14 million of Medvedev’s claimed 53 million votes were fraudulent, as was 15% of his claimed 49% “mandate.” Even under the Kremlin’s corrupt scenario, less than half the country supported Medvedev. In actual fact, barely a third did so. Little wonder, then, that the Kremlin felt the need to be so aggressive with the fraud.

In recent days, we have seen two utterly ridiculous Russophile myths laid permanently to rest. First, that Vladimir Putin would step aside after his second term ended. Instead of doing that, he’s not only assumed the prime ministry but vastly expanded the powers of that office and seized control of the party of power, United Russia, as well. And second, that he was so overwhelmingly popular in Russia that there was no need to engage in fraud to propel Medvedev to victory. Even though every legitimate opposition candidate had been purged from the ballot, Medvedev still only had the support of one-third of the population. What might have happened if there was a real race, with debates and pointed criticism of Medvedev’s credentials.

Moreover, if the fraud was unnecessary and Putin engaged in it anyway, there could be no more brutal insight into the utter malignancy of his character than that. It would mean he’s pure evil.

A joke is making the rounds in Russia these days. Putin and Medvedev are sitting in a restaurant having dinner. The waiter approaches and asks what Putin will have for his main course, and Putin responds: “I’ll have the steak.” The waiter replies: “And what would you like for your vegetable?” Putin answers, glancing sidelong at Medvedev: “The vegetable will have steak too.”

It’s a telling anecdote, because it’s not only Medvedev, but the entire nation, that now serves as Putin’s vegetable. True, 65% of Russians withheld their support from Putin’s hand-picked successor — but that’s the least they could have done. Though knowing Putin’s replacement was a sham, they still meekly allowed the ballot to be purged of rival candidates, stand mute when electoral fraud is exposed, and turn a blind eye as political parties and media outlets are brutally crushed under Putin’s jackboot.

Soon, Russia’s vegetables are going to be harvested by Farmer Putin, sucked up into a giant neo-Soviet threshing machine and pulverized into pulp, shoved into cans and stacked on shelves to await the next ice age.

It’s a fate that’s, sadly, nothing short of what the vast majority of Russians deserve, one they’ve brought on themselves. We tried to warn them, as did many others. They paid no heed.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
Filipino people are soooo familiar with this kind of story, as you may have seen over CNN, etc. The Philippine government reeks of issues of electoral fraud, votebuying, political machinations, and patronage politics.

Second thing in common: we also shout out our protest to the world. No longer a croak or whimper. Our writers freely write about it, too.

Third thing in common: we have also come to realize that we get the government that we deserve.
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
Thanks for your comment, Grace!

However, I think that your people are protesting much more actively and vibrantly than Russians, who are really quite passive.

And a more important difference is the crazy fact that Russia sits on the G-8, supposedly a group of the world’s largest democracies, when in fact it’s the opposite.
2 Stars
Gagandeep
Shimla, India
That the result was a foregone conclusion was evident from the beginning itself. But I’d think the right question to ask is Why? Why did the voters allow so blatant a violation of their democratic rights? Was it because there was no real competition? Or perhaps is a tacit support to the hard-line policies of MR. Putin, which have given Russia some semblance of voice on the global stage? Maybe it is a bit of both.

I mean even if the figures were so blown out of proportion, the real figures don’t reflect to well on the voter’s willingness to assert their right to change.

I seriously wonder if people have become submissive, satisfied or, maybe even, apathetic,
Add your Comment