Menage a Trois in Moscow
16 Star
Share This Post
Kim , New York: Jun 18 2008
Made Popular Jun 19 2008

tony_blair_is_a_wanker_mnluZ_16149

You can judge a country by the company it keeps.

When you think of Russia’s company, you think of Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah. You think of George Bush, apparently one of the world’s most hated figures, looking into Vladimir “Pooty-Poot” Putin’s eyes, glimpsing his soul and finding him “trustworthy.” When you think of the United States you think of NATO, Germany, France, Britain and Japan.

Where Russia’s allies are not actually evil, they are the ragtag flotsam and jetsam of the world, struggling for continued relevance in a world that would simply like to put them out to pasture. In this category we can place the likes of former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former British Premier Tony Blair, who were both in Russia this week helpfully parroting the Kremlin’s propaganda line designed to get the West to drop its guard so dictatorship can achieve final consolidation.

KMO_088198_22054_1m.jpg

Kissinger will be forever associated with the corrupt administration of Richard Nixon, the only U.S. president ever forced to resign from office in disgrace, and with his inability to speak the English language without a foreign accent. Accused by some of being a war criminal, he won the Nobel Peace prize, just like Yasir Arafat and Jimmy Carter. He was Time magazine’s person of the year in 1972, just like Stalin was and the dictator Putin would become. Blair’s Labor Party is in the throes of utter collapse in Britain. Both have long ago passed from the limelight, and seem to want it back. In Kissenger’s case, senility appears to be creeping in.

110867349.jpg

Kissinger stated to Medvedev: “I have followed with great interest your becoming president and the plans you have put forward in some of your speeches. I wish you every success. It is important for Russia and important for the world.” God only knows what that gibberish is supposed to mean, but the fact that Kissinger didn’t say a word of public criticism about Medvedev, much less mention either the mind-blowing sham of his rigged election combined with his “predecessor” remaining in office as prime minister, and was photographed smiling and chatting with Medvedev, is being used by the Kremlin to score propaganda points and offset criticism over human rights violations recently raised by many countries’ actual leaders.

Kissinger is the U.S. chair of the panel called “Russia-USA: A Look Into the Future” which was formed last year and is also co-chaired by Russia’s former Prime Minister and KGB spymaster Yevgeny Primakov. While in Moscow he stated: “If supply is limited and demand increases, if countries compete for access to energy on a purely national basis, we are bound to see a repetition of the colonial conflicts of 19th century.” Marshal Goldman responded: “At the present time, Russia is not in a position to worry there won’t be enough for Russia. If anything, it might make Russia even more aware of the fact that they are in a very commanding position.”

In other words, Kissinger is a crazy old man who is doing the Kremlin’s bidding, not really so different that Germany ex-leader Gerhard Schroeder. Blair, in Moscow to attend a private investor’s conference, continued this line, stating: “Power is shifting east, and it’s shifting fast, not just to China and, in time, to India, but also to the Middle East and to Russia. They have a pride in Russia today they didn’t have ten years ago. We, in countries like mine, have to understand that change in psyche.”

Pride indeed. They’ve learned to be proud of the murder of Politkovskaya and the jailing of Khodorkovsky. They revel in the fact that their men don’t live to reach age 60. They beam over their lack of news reporting, political opposition and local government. They strut and preen over their $4/hour average wage, their AIDS epidemic, their fatalities by fire, their smoking apocalypse. They glow with satisfaction over the exclusion from the WTO and members Georgia/Ukraine heading for NATO. And they do all this much as Germans did when Hitler restored lost German pride after World War I.

The strange thing is that Mr. Blair isn’t planning to move to Russia right away! Well, he’s only British, so by his own terms he’s probably a bit slow on the uptake. He’ll figure it out sooner or later.

A book review in the Telegraph points out that when Ronald Reagan dealt with the USSR, he ridiculed its leaders to their faces rather than enabling their victim mentality as Blair would seek to do. One could say that, since he didn’t patronize, Reagan showed far more respect. The Telegraph relates:

Poor Mr Gorbachev. Every time he met Ronald Reagan at a summit, he was subjected by the American President to a stream of Russian jokes. Or rather, to be precise, Soviet jokes - the point of which was always to satirise some aspect of life under communism. What made it worse was that some of them really were very funny. I like the one, for example, about the man who goes to buy a car in Moscow, pays for it, and is told by the salesman that he can collect it on a particular date in 10 years’ time. The buyer thinks for a moment and then asks: ‘Morning or afternoon?’ The salesman, astonished by the question, asks: ‘What difference does it make?’ And the buyer answers: ‘Well, the plumber is coming in the morning.’

America had a foreign policy then, and a real leader to enact it. Perhaps, come November, we will again.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Manual Upload
Sorry, no media found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
2 Stars
Anna
Moscow, Russia
I know Russia is bad, but which country isn't. Think of a name and you could find hundreds of reasons why it is bad. But by this we should not get contended and do nothing; but we should also not overdo anything. I think yo are trying to read too much between the lines. One should not forget that USA and UK the bastions of democracy and freedom themselves are very much in line with Russia on most of the matters.
1 Stars
Seshu jewwatch.com
Brooklyn, United States
Well said Anna,

There is no truth in all the bad press about Russia or the company it keeps.

US and its Nato allies have done more evil deeds in history than all others could ever contemplate - Atomic bombing of Japan, Vietnam war, Korean war, South American Wars and Iraq war.
1 Stars
Kim publiuspundit.com/
New York, United States
You see, that’s what Russian people have been saying for centuries now. Instead of admitting their faults and trying to fix them, they say all countries have faults and leave them alone.

That is why, today, the average Russian man doesn’t live to see age 60 while the average American man lives nearly 20 years longer.

The USSR was destroyed. Do you want Russia to follow the same path?
1 Stars
Ali
Tehran, Iran
"When you think of Russia’s company, you think of Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah. You think of George Bush, apparently one of the world’s most hated figures, looking into Vladimir “Pooty-Poot” Putin’s eyes, glimpsing his soul and finding him “trustworthy.” When you think of the United States you think of NATO, Germany, France, Britain and Japan."

Statement of the day! What do you have to say about the USA's continued support of the despots in Latin America, Africa and elsewhere. A couple of decades back, Saddam Hussein was USA's blue eyed boy.

What kind of propaganda is this?
1 Stars
Lewis Waters rightinaleftworld.bl..
Vancouver, Wa., United States
”US and its Nato allies have done more evil deeds in history than all others could ever contemplate - Atomic bombing of Japan, Vietnam war, Korean war, South American Wars and Iraq war.”

Adressing just one of the usual leftist talking points, if it hadn’t been for Pearl Harbor, Hiroshima and Nagasaki would never have happened.

That simple point is often over looked.
1 Stars
Jonty instablogs.com
New Delhi, India
Do you really think Pearl Harbour was a good enough reason to nuke Japan? If at all you needed to ’reason’ Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, I would have liked it more if you cited the Asian Holocaust as a reason.

Lewis, you are a star here and I expected something better from you. How come you are so myopic that you can’t look beyond your own nose?

Pearl Harbour was indeed the reason why the United States of America jumped into the War. The selfishness of USA cannot be better exemplified than USA’s continued refusal to jump into the war despite Europe’s desperate cries for help and after 63 years, Lewis comment here.

Pearl Harbour it is. *heh*
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Jonty, to be fair, I think Lewis simply meant that the scenario, in which Japan was bombed, would have never taken place if the bombing of Pearl Harbor had not happened. I don’t think he’s totally equivocating the actions.

If there’s any real, arguable reason for the use of nuclear weapons on Japan, it’s that a protracted naval and land war would have ensued. This could have potentially lasted for months and would have eventually led to the loss of even more lives than the bombs that were used did. At least, that was the military reasoning behind using Fatman and Little Boy.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Paula
Helsinki , Finland
The political activity especially towards foreign affairs in the Kremlin is quite alarming keeping in view that Russia is a distinct country from the erstwhile Soviet Union. When the USSR was existent the communist rulers had to balance a lot of things either through fear and intimidation or greed in the various republics that formed the union. Then there was a systematic process of Russification carried out by the dominant Russians in the other republics. There was a time when you had to go to the outskirts of Kiev to hear people speaking the Ukrainian language.

The situation now is quite different. Putin has less hassles to mind. Therefore, he is now more dangerous keeping a single track mind on what he wishes to achieve for his country or more importantly for himself. He is promoting Russian nationalism and such a thing in a country armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons enough to obliterate earth many times over is extremely dangerous. Imagine the situation when a real nationalist (not the pseudo one like Putin) comes to power. This is a catastrophe.
1 Stars
Yash
Gwalior, India
Nixon was a bastard who actually thought of nuking India during the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971 when India dismembered Pakistan to create Bangladesh. Henry Kissinger now claims to be India's friend. If not for the veiled threat of USSR then warning the USA to stay off the war, who knows what might have happened. Indeed time changes so many things and that includes hearts and beliefs. When Putin is reinventing the Cold War, it is hilarious to see Kissinger and Blair in Moscow do what they are.
1 Stars
Lewis Waters rightinaleftworld.bl..
Vancouver, Wa., United States
”Do you really think Pearl Harbour was a good enough reason to nuke Japan?”

To put it very simply, Jonty, they started the war, the allies finished it.

Would an invasion of Japan resulting in many millions more deaths have been preferable?

As for other ”conflicts” mentioned, Korea and Viet Nam both were to stem the spread of communism, of which history shows the left interfered with and handed the communists Viet Nam on a platter, which also resulted in another Asian Holocaust, ignored by the left today.

As far as Iraq goes, the reasons were plain, simple and open, and also ignored in the hate America binge of the leftist, in America and abroad.

Radical extremists have vowed to rule the world. They are imposing their will by terror. If you enjoy having freedom, it is long past time to take a stand against them.

If you don’t have the stomach for it, stand out of the way and others will protect your freedoms for you.
1 Stars
Jonty instablogs.com
New Delhi, India
”Radical extremists have vowed to rule the world. They are imposing their will by terror. If you enjoy having freedom, it is long past time to take a stand against them.”

I completely agree with you at least on this one. Therefore, ”If you don’t have the stomach for it, stand out of the way and others will protect your freedoms for you”, stands null and void for me.

Thanks for showing the spirit in replying. :-)
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment